首页> 外文OA文献 >Multicenter Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Streptococcus Species▿
【2h】

Multicenter Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Streptococcus Species▿

机译:BD Phoenix自动化微生物系统对链球菌种的药敏试验的多中心评价▿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This multicenter study evaluated the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System STREP panel (BD Diagnostic Systems). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with 13 agents was performed on 2,013 streptococci (938 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates; 396 group B streptococci [GBS]; 369 viridans group streptococci [VGS]; 290 beta-hemolytic streptococcus groups A, C, and G; and 20 other streptococci) with the Phoenix system and a broth microdilution reference method. Clinical and challenge isolates were tested against cefepime, cefotaxime (CTX), ceftriaxone (CTR), clindamycin (CLI), erythromycin (ERY), gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, penicillin (PEN), tetracycline (TET), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Clinical isolates with major errors or very major errors (VMEs) were retested in duplicate by both methods. The final results for clinical isolates showed the following trends. For all of the organism-antimicrobial agent combinations tested, categorical agreement (CA) was 92 to 100%, with one exception—VGS-PEN (87% CA; all errors were minor). For S. pneumoniae, there was one major error with CLI (0.1%) and one or two VMEs with CTX (4%), CTR (4.5%), ERY (0.9%), and TET (0.7%). For groups A, C, and G, the CA was 97 to 100% and the only VMEs were resolved by additional reference laboratory testing. For GBS, there was only one VME (TET, 0.3%) and D-zone testing of 23 isolates with CLI major errors (one isolate unavailable) revealed inducible CLI resistance. For VGS, the major error rates were 0 to 3% and VMEs occurred with seven agents (3.5 to 7.1%). The mean times required for organism groups to generate results ranged from 8.4 to 9.4 h. The Phoenix system provided reliable and rapid AST results for most of the organism-antimicrobial agent combinations tested.
机译:这项多中心研究评估了BD Phoenix自动化微生物系统STREP面板(BD诊断系统)。对2,013株链球菌(938株肺炎链球菌; 396株B链球菌[GBS]; 369株rid子链球菌[VGS]; 290个β-溶血性链球菌A,C和G组)进行了13种药物的抗菌药敏试验(AST)。用Phoenix系统和肉汤微量稀释参考方法(其他20个链球菌)。临床和挑战隔离株针对头孢吡肟,头孢噻肟(CTX),头孢曲松(CTR),克林霉素(CLI),红霉素(ERY),加替沙星,左氧氟沙星,利奈唑胺,美洛培南,青霉素(PEN),四环素(TET),三甲氧嘧啶和万古霉素。两种方法均重复测试有重大错误或非常重大错误(VME)的临床分离株。临床分离株的最终结果显示以下趋势。对于所有测试的生物体-抗菌剂组合,分类一致性(CA)为92%至100%,其中一个例外-VGS-PEN(CA为87%;所有错误均很小)。对于肺炎链球菌,CLI(0.1%)有一个主要错误,CTX(4%),CTR(4.5%),ERY(0.9%)和TET(0.7%)有一个或两个VME。对于A,C和G组,CA为97%至100%,唯一的VME通过其他参考实验室测试得以解决。对于GBS,只有一种VME(TET,0.3%),对23种具有CLI重大错误的分离株(无一种分离株)进行D区测试显示出可诱导的CLI抗性。对于VGS,主要错误率为0到3%,并且有7个代理(3.5到7.1%)发生VME。有机体组产生结果所需的平均时间为8.4至9.4小时。 Phoenix系统为所测试的大多数生物体-抗菌剂组合提供了可靠且快速的AST结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号